Piracy with Business in a Box
I had heard of many land owners express their intolerance for business in a box packages. I hadn’t realized the reason until Keiko Rau pointed out how I was affected. Someone took my freebie products and put it in a large collection of freebies, and sold them off. Other people put my product up for sale. The 360 Floor Mat here is being sold for 50L$. I can’t stand it. If someone had made changes and developed it into a different product, I could understand. I never intended for people to pay for this product and am deeply offended. Should we get better access restrictions on the products? How about if SL fully supported something like creative commons to share, remix, and reuse legally? Scapoli (121, 252) - Feb 8, 2008 (298 days ago) by Dedric Mauriac Tags for this Snapshot360 50l access affected box business collection commons creative deeply developed express floor freebie freebies fully heard intended intolerance keiko land large legally made mat offended owners packages pay people piracy pointed product products put rau realized reason remix restrictions reuse sale scapoli share sl sold stand supported understand Leave a CommentYou're not logged in. If you want to post a comment, please log in. |
Send in your snapshotsTo send in your own snapshots, simply send them as postcards to pics@slbuzz.com directly from within Second Life. You don't even need to be an SLBuzz member! So give it a shot! If you want to, we can even crosspost them to your flickr account automagically—simply link your SLBuzz account with flickr, and send snapshots to flickr@slbuzz.com. |