Too many faces
One of the tings that can slow down renduring time is the amount of faces, edges, and points that a card has to render. A point is where the lines meet up. An edge is the line between each point. A face is the triangle that appears when you have three edges connect three points. A square at minimum will have four points, and five edges, and two faces. A cube would end up having eight points, 18 edges, and 12 faces. Turning on Occlusion in my Rendering Info Displays revealed that this is not the case. Cubes appear to be split in a 3×3 grid on each side resulting in 56 points, 162 edges, and 108 faces.
The interesting part is when I turned the mesh detail down to the bare minimum, the cube I was looking at went down to the basic 8 points, 18 edges, and 12 faces. This is great except any round prims, flexi’s or sculpties looked horrible. Turning the mesh detail up to the max resulted in the 3×3 subdivision of the side mesh.
Cylindars are the same way. I can understand the need to have the edge of the circle to be subdivided for a smoother surface. What I can not understand is the subdivision along the height of the cylindar.
I believe that the mesh for our prims can be further optimized. I had always assumed that they were in their most simplest forms. I wonder what the benefit is for subdividing the side up like this is.
Woodbridge (81, 75)
- Jan 13, 2008 (323 days ago)
by Dedric Mauriac
Tags for this Snapshot
108
12
162
18
3x3
56
8
amount
appears
assumed
bare
basic
benefit
card
case
circle
connect
cube
cubes
cylindar
cylindars
detail
displays
edge
edges
end
face
faces
flexis
forms
great
grid
height
horrible
info
interesting
line
lines
looked
max
meet
mesh
minimum
occlusion
optimized
part
point
points
prims
render
rendering
renduring
resulted
resulting
revealed
round
sculpties
side
simplest
slow
smoother
split
square
subdivided
subdividing
subdivision
surface
time
tings
triangle
turned
turning
understand
woodbridge
Leave a Comment
You're not logged in.
If you want to post a comment, please log in.